Mother Should I Trust The Government?
July 7th, 2008I’ve been thinking about 9/11 quite a bit as of late.
A few weeks back I watched American Zeitgeist (watch it free here) which I found to be quite interesting, although I would like to see a Michael Moore style “fact check” done on several sections of it. One of the sections of American Zeitgeist focuses on 9/11 and a conspiracy theory that revolves around the US governments’ involvement as a means of ultimately creating a one world government. (A bit out there, I know.)
I then came across a bootleg of the 9/11/01 installment of Howard Stern’s show. Being both a news junkie and a radio nerd I snagged it and gave it a listen. Howard’s 9/11 broadcast really was quite remarkable and thinking back to the news coverage I read/watched/listened to that day Howard did a better job of getting the news out. One of the most striking things about that broadcast, to me, is the calls for immediate action, including action that may kill a large numbers of civilians. This started before either tower collapsed. I found this especially interesting given many of the 9/11, Iraq War, and Neocon related comments that are made on Stern’s show these days…
As an aside, as I write this, a “specialty program” just came onto Howard Stern’s Howard-101 channel on Sirius featuring a number of conspiracy theorists discussing their theories on 9/11. I had no idea that this was going to be one, but I didn’t change the channel after Bubba’s show…
Lastly, out of curiosity, I started reading some of the 9/11 conspiracy theory web sites. Especially those related to the theory that it was not the airplanes that crashed into the World Trade Center buildings that ultimately brought them to the ground. I must admit that some of their theories and criticisms do seem to be well thought out and are interesting. Most, if not all, revolve around the belief that 9/11 was an inside job. Presumably, as a means of starting a war.
I am willing to believe that the US Government had a hand in 9/11. I am able to believe this quite easily actually. I’m also willing to believe that this may have been done as a means of starting a “war on terror” (among other things). However, there is one thing that I can not make sense of when buying into these theories: if 9/11 was staged why did the buildings have to be brought down? Wouldn’t a simple set of crashes into the buildings have been sufficient? Why did a plane have to be crashed near Pittsburgh and another into the Pentagon? That seems like a hell of a lot of excessive collateral damage to start a war.
So, conspiracy theorists, please tell me, what am I missing?